Chiropractic Elk Grove
Chiropractor Elk Grove, South Sacramento, Galt & Laguna (916) 685-1230
8580 Elk Ridge Way, Elk Grove, CA 95624

Chiropractic Elk Grove

Balancing Act: Why pH is Crucial to Health

February 26th, 2010 . by DrHansen

Most of us never consider the acid/alkaline balance of our blood, but a proper pH is a crucial aspect to health. Many doctors stress the importance of pH because a balanced pH protects us from the inside out. Disease and disorder, they say, cannot take root in a body whose pH is in balance. It is an imbalance of acidity and alkalinity that allows unhealthy organisms to flourish, damages tissues and organs and compromises the immune system.

So what is proper pH?

What we call pH is short for the potential of hydrogen. It is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of our body’s fluids and tissues. It is measured on a scale from 0 to 14. The more acidic a solution is, the lower its pH. The more alkaline, the higher the number is.

A pH of 7 is perfectly neutral. The healthiest pH is one that is slightly alkaline. Optimally, we want a pH of 7.365. This number will fluctuate throughout the day, but the normal range is between 6 and 7.5.

What affects pH?

Normally, the kidneys maintain our electrolyte levels, those of calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium. When we are exposed to acidic substances, these electrolytes are used to combat acidity. High degrees of acidity force our bodies to rob minerals from the bones, cells, organs and tissues. Cells end up lacking enough minerals to properly dispose of waste or oxygenate completely. Vitamin absorption is compromised by mineral loss. Toxins and pathogens accumulate in the body and the immune system becomes suppressed.

What causes acidity in your body?

  • Alcohol and drug use
  • Antibiotic overuse
  • Artificial sweeteners
  • Chronic stress
  • Declining nutrient levels in foods due to industrial farming
  • Low levels of fiber in the diet
  • Lack of exercise
  • Excess animal meats in the diet (from non-grass fed sources)
  • Excess hormones from foods, health and beauty products and plastics
  • Exposure to chemicals and radiation from household cleansers, building materials, computers, cell phones and microwaves
  • Food coloring and preservatives
  • Over-exercise
  • Pesticides and herbicides
  • Pollution
  • Poor chewing and eating habits
  • Processed and refined foods
  • Shallow breathing

What are the effects of acidity on health?

  • Allergies, asthma and congestion
  • Fatigue
  • Frequent colds
  • Headaches
  • Inflammation
  • Joint and muscle pain
  • Skin problems
  • Ulcers
  • Weight gain

Over the long term, acidosis can lead to:

  • Arthritis
  • Cancer
  • Diabetes
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Heart disease
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Osteoporosis
  • Stroke

How Can You Achieve a Proper pH?

Even though there are many sources of acidity and toxicity in our environments, the biggest contributor to unbalanced pH is our diet.

Fruits and vegetables contain potassium, a natural buffer to acidity. The western diet contains little in the way of fresh and raw fruits and vegetables.

Processed foods contain tons of sodium chloride–table salt–which constricts blood vessels and creates acidity.

Eating too much animal protein causes sulfuric acid to build up in the blood as amino acids are broken down.

All grains, whole or not, create acidity in the body. Americans ingest most of their plant food quota in the form of processed corn or wheat.

Our problem is more a matter of not taking in enough alkaline-promoting foods rather than taking in too much acid.

Calcium-rich dairy products cause some of the highest rates of osteoporosis. That’s because they create acidity in the body! When your blood stream becomes too acidic, it will steal calcium (a more alkaline substance) from the bones to try to balance out the pH level. So the best way to prevent osteoporosis is to eat lots of alkaline green leafy veggies!

Acid-Forming Foods

  • Cold cuts
  • Corn flakes
  • Eggs
  • Lentils
  • Oats
  • Conventional Meats: beef, chicken and pork
  • Milk
  • Pasta
  • Peanuts and walnuts
  • Rice
  • White bread
  • Whole wheat

Certain foods on this list, like eggs and walnuts, might be acidic in your body, but don’t let that scare you away from eating them. They contain a host of health benefits like antioxidants and omega-3 fatty acids. A healthy balance is what we are shooting for where pH is concerned–it is possible to become too alkaline.

Alkaline Foods

Fruits, mushrooms and vegetables (especially citrus, dates, raisins and spinach) promote an alkaline pH.

Strangely enough, acidic fruits such as grapefruit and tomatoes don’t create acidity in the body. They do just the opposite and contribute to an alkaline environment.

Raw foods

Uncooked fruits and vegetables are said to be biogenic or “life-giving.” Cooking foods depletes alkalinizing minerals. Increase your intake of raw foods, and try juicing or lightly steaming fruits and vegetables.

Alkaline Water

Alkaline water has a pH of 9 to 11. Distilled water is just fine to drink. Water filtered with a Reverse Osmosis filter is slightly acidic, but it’s still a far better option than tap water or purified bottled water. Adding pH drops, lemon or lime, or baking soda to your water boosts alkalinity.

Green Drinks

Drinks made from green vegetables and grasses in powder form are loaded with alkaline-forming foods and chlorophyll. Chlorophyll is structurally similar to our own blood and alkalizes the blood.

How to test your own pH

You can test your pH by purchasing strips at your local health foods store or pharmacy. You can measure your pH with saliva or urine. Your second urination of the morning will give you the best results. You compare the colors on your test strip to a chart that comes with your test strip kit.

During the day, the best time to test your pH is one hour before a meal and two hours after a meal.

If you test with your saliva, you want to try to stay between 6.8 and 7.2.

February 25th, 2010 . by DrHansen

« Lack of Sleep Means Lack of Weight Loss »

Sleep is one of the most undervalued essential practices in modern society.  In 1910, an average night’s sleep was 9 hours. By 1975, it was down to 7.5 hours. From 2000 to 2002, polls found that it had fallen to 6.9 hours. Today, many people average just 5-6 hours of sleep per night.

At the same time, obesity rates have doubled! Sleep and the neuroendocrine system are intricately entwined. Chronic lack of sleep is thought to be linked to diabetes, hypertension, obesity and memory loss. Lack of sleep increases blood pressure and the risk of heart disease.

A recent study by the University of Chicago found that cutting sleep from 8 hours to 4 hours a night for less than one week produced physiological changes that resembled the effects of advanced aging and early diabetes.

Those changes happened in less than one week!

The study’s participants took 40% longer to regulate their blood-sugar levels after eating and their ability to secrete insulin and respond to it decreased by 30%.

Lack of sleep affects the secretion of thyroid-stimulating hormone and increased levels of the “stress hormone,” cortisol.

The study found that recovery occurred and above-average functioning occurred when the subjects slept more than 8 hours a night.

So how does sleep affect weight?

Sleep affects the release of hormones by the hypothalamic-pituitary axes (HPA) and the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Sleep triggers or inhibits the production or release of various hormones.

Growth hormone is affected by sleep. You can work out for hours, but if you don’t get enough sleep your body is not going to turn fat into muscle.

Lack of sleep raises the level of cortisol which triggers the fight-or-flight response. During stress, our body shuts down normal maintenance. It activates fat storage and releases lots of sugar (for instant energy) into the bloodstream. It depletes the body of nutrients and triggers cravings for simple carbohydrates and sugar. Chronic stress promotes insulin resistance.

Leptin and ghrelin are two very important appetite-controlling hormones that are linked to sleep. Leptin suppresses appetite and ghrelin increases it. When people are subjected to sleep loss, leptin levels fall and ghrelin levels rise. Even when they received plenty of nutrition, people that didn’t get adequate sleep were compelled to eat more. Because leptin levels were low, their brains just didn’t get the message that they were satiated—instead they just kept getting the message: “Hungry! Eat!” When deprived of sleep, study participant’s desire for high-carbohydrate and calorie-dense foods increased by 45%.

A joint study conducted by Stanford University and the University of Wisconsin measured leptin and ghrelin levels, body fat and sleep amounts in 1000 people. They found that those who slept less than 8 hours a night had low leptin levels, high ghrelin levels and higher levels of body fat. The participants that slept the fewest hours a night weighed the most.

Another study, presented at the 2006 American Thoracic Society International Conference, came up with some confounding information. 70,000 middle-aged women were studied for 16 years.

The study found that:

  • Women who sleep 5 hours or less weigh more than those that sleep 7 hours.
  • Women who sleep 5 hours per night are 32% more likely to experience weight gain of 33 pounds or more and 15% more likely to become obese than those that sleep 7 hours.
  • Women that sleep 6 hours a night are 12% more likely to gain 33 pounds or more and 6% more likely to become obese than those that sleep 7 hours.

What was confounding in this particular study is the fact that the women that slept less did not eat more.

“Prior studies have shown that after just a few days of sleep restriction, the hormones that control appetite cause people to become hungrier, so we thought that women who slept less might eat more,” says the study’s leader, Sanjay Patel. “But, in fact, they ate less. That suggests that appetite and diet are not accounting for the weight gain in women who sleep less.”

So even though leptin and ghrelin levels might affect appetite, it is more likely that the hormones that affect the metabolism of glucose and insulin-response are behind weight gain during sleep deprivation.

February 24th, 2010 . by DrHansen


To Salt or Not to Salt? »

Doctors and scientists have long been telling us to reduce our salt intake, so it may be hard to swallow when I tell you research shows that a low-salt diet doesn’t reduce high blood pressure. But the type of salt you are consuming does make a world of difference for your health.

Nutritionist Sally Fallon reminds us that all traditional cultures have used salt in some form. But they didn’t, of course, use the refined table salt we find in our salt shakers. They used salt from the sea.

Refined Table Salt vs. Sea Salt

Refined salt is produced from sea salt originally. It starts as a ‘real food’ then quickly becomes a ‘fake food.’ Manufacturers harvest this salt with methods that strip it of all its naturally-occurring minerals. They then use a number of additives (including aluminum) to dry it and heat it to temperatures of about 1,200 degrees, which alters its chemical structure. The stripped iodine is replaced with potassium iodide in potentially toxic amounts. The salt is then stabilized with dextrose, which turns it purple. Finally it is bleached white.

Sun-dried sea salt, on the other hand, is laced with marine life (organic forms of iodine) and many essential minerals. This type of salt remains in the body at work for several weeks. Refined salt passes through the body quickly and may be why researcher Henry Bieler found signs of sodium starvation in people who ate lots of refined salt.

Celtic sea salt, that which is farmed with ancient methods from the salt marshes of Brittany, is one of the best varieties that are readily available in the US. It is light grey in color and carries 80 trace minerals and 14% of it is composed of macro-minerals. Red sea salt from Hawaii is superior to Celtic sea salt but is much harder to obtain.

What Sea Salt Provides

Aside from seasoning our food and adding taste, sea salt provides us with sodium, chloride, iodine, and a host of other essential minerals.

Sodium

Every bodily fluid contains sodium. Why? It is needed for many biochemical processes including (but not limited to): adrenal gland function, cell wall stability, muscle contractions, nerve stimulation, pH and water balance regulation.

Chloride

Chloride works in concert with sodium and potassium to regulate pH in the blood and the passage of fluids across cell membranes. Chloride is the basis of hydrochloric acid which is needed to digest protein. Chloride also activates enzymes that digest carbohydrates and is necessary for the proper growth and functioning of the brain.

Trace amounts of chloride can also be found in celery and coconut.

Iodine

Iodine is needed for many biochemical processes including: fat metabolism, mental development, muscle function, the production of sex hormones and thyroid function.

Iodine is found in most foods from the sea including fish broths, kelp and seaweed. It is also found in butter, asparagus, artichokes, dark green vegetables and pineapple.

Salt and Science

A study published in the 1985 British Medical Journal involved people that had a family history of high blood pressure. The participants restricted their salt intake for eight weeks. At the end of the study, no differences were found in their blood pressure readings.

Award-winning researcher Gary Taubes published a report called “The (Political) Science of Salt” in a 1998 edition of Science Magazine. In the report, Taubes concluded that “After interviews with some 80 researchers, clinicians, and administrators around the world, it is safe to say that if ever there were a controversy over the interpretation of scientific data, this is it…”

“After decades of intensive research, the apparent benefits of avoiding salt have only diminished. This suggests that either the true benefit has now been revealed and is indeed small or that it is non-existent and researchers believing they have detected such benefits have been deluded by the confounding of other variables.”

Salt and Processed Food

Professor Lichtenstein of the American Heart Association nutrition committee says, “If people eat a diet like the one we recommend that includes plenty of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fish, they probably won’t be consuming a lot of sodium.”

Therein lies the rub.

Most of the salt that people consume in the United States doesn’t get sprinkled on our food from a salt shaker. It is already present in the large amounts of processed foods the average American consumes.

This is a big deal when you realize that we spend over 90% of our grocery funds on processed foods in the US.

Dietician Katherine Zeratsky explains that salt is used to prevent spoilage and kill bacteria in processed foods. It also adds flavor and disguises unwanted tastes in food. The American Heart Association recommendation that we limit our salt intake to 2,300 mg per day is the amount of salt we eat in just an average amount of processed foods every day.

Raw vs. Cooked Foods

One of the most important roles of salt is an enzyme activator, says Sally Fallon. This is why, she theorizes, that enzyme researcher Edward Howell found that cultures that eat large quantities of raw foods need very little salt while those that eat mostly cooked foods ingest large quantities of salt.

Raw and fermented foods contain high levels of enzymes which help to digest our food and boost the immune system. Enzymes are deactivated by heat and cause the pancreas to work overtime.

Edward Howell found that low enzyme ingestion causes a “shortened life span, illness and lowered resistance to stress of all types.” He also found that people who ate mostly cooked foods, especially grains, had enlarged pancreases and smaller glands and other organs.

The health disparity of many Asian cultures as compared to ours is most likely due in part to the amount of raw and fermented foods in their diet. Ke-tsiap was an enzyme and mineral-rich condiment borrowed from the East by Dutch traders. The English added mushrooms and walnuts to this fermented fish sauce, Americans added tomatoes, and this once tasty and nutritious condiment is the forerunner of our highly processed favorite today: ketchup, which is now mostly cooked tomato and high-fructose corn syrup. Yet another example of a ‘real food’ becoming a ‘fake food.’

Sources

Nourishing Traditions, 2001

Weston A Price Foundation, 1999

British Medical Journal, 1985

CBS News, 2006

Science Magazine, 1998

Univ. of California at San Francisco, 2010

Mayo Clinic, 2008

Dr. Joseph Mercola, 2010

February 23rd, 2010 . by DrHansen

The Danger of Daily Aspirin

By ANNA WILDE MATHEWS

If you’re taking a daily aspirin for your heart, you may want to reconsider.

For years, many middle-aged people have taken the drug in hopes of reducing the chance of a heart attack or stroke. Americans bought more than 44 million packages of low-dose aspirin marketed for heart protection in the year ended September, up about 12% from 2005, according to research firm IMS Health.

Podcast

Ned Calonge, the chair of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, explains the new guidelines for recommending aspirin therapy.

[HEARBEAT]Jon Protas/The Wall Street Journal

Now, medical experts say some people who are taking aspirin on a regular basis should think about stopping. Public-health officials are scaling back official recommendations for the painkiller to target a narrower group of patients who are at risk of a heart attack or stroke. The concern is that aspirin’s side effects, which can include bleeding ulcers, might outweigh the potential benefits when taken by many healthy or older people.

“Not everybody needs to take aspirin,” says Sidney Smith, a professor at the University of North Carolina who is chairing a new National Institutes of Health effort to compile treatment recommendations on cardiovascular-disease prevention. Physicians are beginning to tailor aspirin recommendations to “groups where the benefits are especially well established,” he says.

Doctors generally agree that most patients who have already suffered a heart attack or ischemic stroke, the type caused by a clot or other obstruction blocking an artery to the brain, should take regular low-dose aspirin. But for people without heart disease, the newest guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force spell out much more clearly than before when aspirin should be administered.

The guidelines, announced last year, suggest aspirin for certain men 45 to 79 years old with elevated heart-disease risk because of factors like cholesterol levels and smoking. For women, the guidelines don’t focus on heart risk. Instead, the task force recommends certain women should take aspirin regularly if they are 55 to 79 and are in danger of having an ischemic stroke, for reasons that could include high blood pressure and diabetes.

The panel urged doctors to factor in conditions that could increase a patient’s risk of bleeding from aspirin, which tends to rise with age. The group didn’t designate a dose, but suggested that an appropriate amount might be 75 milligrams a day, which is close to the 81mg contained in low-dose, or “baby,” aspirin. The task force didn’t take a position on aspirin for people who are 80 and older because of a lack of data in this age group.

Aspirin Advice

Doctors have been scaling back their aspirin recommendations for people who don’t already have heart disease. Here are the current guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Aspirin recommended for:

  • Some men 45 and older with risk factors for heart disease, assuming no history of ulcers or other bleeding dangers.
  • Some women 55 and older with risk factors for stroke, and no history of bleeding danger.

Aspirin not recommended for:

  • Men younger than 45, and women younger than 55.
  • Anyone 80 and older.

Other medical researchers dispute the idea that there should be different guidelines for men and women. Still, many experts agree that doctors may have been recommending aspirin to people for whom the risks might outweigh the benefits.

Aspirin acts as a blood thinner, which is believed to account for much of its benefit of protecting against heart attacks and strokes. But that same action, along with a tendency to deplete the stomach’s protective lining, can lead to a danger of gastrointestinal bleeding and possibly bleeding in the brain.

The task force issued its latest guidelines after reviewing the evidence from a number of studies on aspirin’s benefits and risks. The recommendations update the panel’s previous guidelines from 2002, which were more broadly written. Those suggested aspirin use for people of any age who were at elevated risk of heart disease.

“We would like doctors to re-look at their patients who are on aspirin and consider recommending stopping it where the chance of harm outweighs the benefit,” says Ned Calonge, a Colorado public-health official who serves as the task force’s chairman. He notes, however, that in studies of healthy people taking aspirin, the actual rates of bleeding and of prevented heart attacks were very low.

Not all patients accustomed to taking aspirin will want to stop. Maxine Fischer, 55 years old, recently figured out that under the new U.S. guidelines, she wouldn’t be encouraged to continue with the drug. Using an online calculator, which factored such data as her age, blood pressure and medical history, she learned she had just a 1% likelihood of a stroke in the next 10 years. Under the guidelines, only women in her age group with at least a 3% or higher stroke risk should take aspirin.

Ms. Fischer, who works as a manager for seniors’ lobby AARP in San Diego, has taken aspirin daily for two years after reading it could reduce the risk of stroke. For the moment, she says she’ll keep it up, partly because she’s more worried about strokes than ulcers. Strokes are “the big scary thing,” she says.

Other patients say they would stick with aspirin because of other benefits attributed to the drug; past research has suggested that regular aspirin may reduce the risk of colon cancer, for instance. Virginia Douglas, 64, a retired trade-association executive, takes aspirin a few times a week. In addition to the possibly reduced risk of stroke, Ms. Douglas hopes to avoid colon cancer, which affected her father and grandfather. “There’s always a new study with a new recommendation,” says Ms. Douglas, of Sacramento, Calif. “You have to do what’s best for you.”

In a separate analysis, published in medical journal Lancet last May, an international group of scientists reached a broadly similar conclusion as did the U.S. task force—that doctors may have been recommending aspirin too widely. “You really have to have a clear margin of benefit over hazard before you should be treating healthy people,” says Colin Baigent, a professor at Oxford University who coordinated the Lancet analysis.

What Aspirin Does

Aspirin’s effects in the body can have good and bad implications.

  • Blood thinner: It inhibits clotting, which helps reduce the risk of heart attack and ischemic stroke but increases the danger of bleeding.
  • Inflammation reducer: It lessens pain and fever by preventing production of the hormone-like substances called prostaglandins. But this can also deplete a protective layer in the stomach and increase the risk of ulcers.

What You Can Do

If you want to figure out if the newest guidelines recommend aspirin for you, here’s where to check:

  • At ahrq.gov, type ‘aspirin and prevention’ into the search box, and the new guidelines will come up in the results. Click on ‘clinical summary’ for a table that explains what people of different ages should do, and includes links to online calculators to help you figure out your risk of heart attack or stroke. You should also speak to your doctor.
  • An analysis published in the British journal the Lancet, which reached somewhat different conclusions.
  • A letter from the task force responding to the Lancet authors’ findings.

Still, the Lancet authors disagreed with the U.S. panel on some important details, particularly about who should be taking aspirin. The two groups examined evidence largely from the same studies of the drug, although the international team analyzed the data differently. In the end, the international team of scientists, unlike the U.S. officials, concluded that aspirin’s effects on men and women were mostly the same.

Another disagreement between the two groups also emerged: The U.S. task force said that age is the biggest factor determining a person’s risk of internal bleeding from aspirin. But the international team said other factors, such as diabetes and high blood pressure, also play a significant role. Unfortunately, the scientists noted, the same factors that increase patients’ risk of bleeding also increase their risk of developing heart disease. This, in turn, can make it more difficult to calculate whether the benefits of aspirin would outweigh the risks of side effects.

The U.S. task force responded with a letter to the Lancet, defending its finding that men and women’s results did appear different. There is a “wealth of evidence that men and women have different cardiovascular disease manifestations and respond differently to aspirin,” the letter said. The panel also reiterated its position that bleeding risk is best parsed by age.

Amid the debate, some individual doctors are finding their own position. Rodney Hayward, who codirects a Veterans Affairs research center in Ann Arbor, Mich., says he’s not convinced that aspirin’s effects on men and women are so different. He says he continues to recommend aspirin for certain patients of both sexes with significant heart risk.

Vitamin D Fights Crohn’s Disease

February 22nd, 2010 . by DrHansen
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
February 20 2010 | 28,926 views

A new study has found that Vitamin D can counter the effects of Crohn’s disease.

Researchers found that Vitamin D acts directly on the beta defensin 2 gene, which encodes an antimicrobial peptide, and the NOD2 gene that alerts cells to the presence of invading microbes.

Both beta defensin and NOD2 have been linked to Crohn’s disease. If NOD2 is deficient or defective, it cannot combat invaders in the intestinal tract.

Sources:

Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

Follow me on Facebook Follow me on Twitter

Science has known for some time of the importance of vitamin D in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases like Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis. I posted a study on this ten years ago.

In my view it is reprehensible and irresponsible not to measure the levels of vitamin D in patients with this disease. You need to measure the vitamin D level in your blood, as it is virtually impossible to simply know whether or not it is in the therapeutic levels of 55 to 65 ng/ml.

If you or someone you know has this disease, please beg them to get their vitamin D level monitored. Most adults need at least 5000 units per day, but some may actually require up to 50,000 units per day. There is just no way of knowing without measuring.

Also there is NO benefit, and likely some harm if you take too much. So simply popping loads of vitamin D pills is not the way to optimize your vitamin D. The only time you don’t need to measure your vitamin D levels is when you have nearly daily access to high quality sunshine.

Crohn’s Disease is an Immune System Disorder

Crohn’s disease is a chronic condition that causes inflammation of your gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Any area of your digestive tract can be affected, from your mouth to your anus, but Crohn’s most commonly affects the lower part of your small intestine known as the ileum. Swelling from the inflammation can be painful and often results in diarrhea.

Crohn’s is found in men and women in equal numbers and seems to have a genetic component. About 20 percent of Crohn’s sufferers also have a relative – usually a parent or sibling — with some form of inflammatory bowel disease.

The cause of Crohn’s is thought to be impairment in the way your immune system handles intestinal bacteria. This improper immune system response leads to an inflammatory condition that can result in an autoimmune disorder.

If you have an autoimmune disorder, it means your immune system is attacking and destroying healthy body tissue.

Vitamin D is the Miracle Nutrient for Your Immune System

One of the reasons that vitamin D may work is that it helps your body produce over 200 anti microbial peptides that help fight all sorts of infections. There are many experts that believe inflammatory bowl disease has an infectious trigger.

From a recent Oregon State University press release:

A new study has concluded that one key part of the immune system, the ability of vitamin D to regulate anti-bactericidal proteins, is so important that it has been conserved through almost 60 million years of evolution and is shared only by primates, including humans – but no other known animal species.

The fact that this vitamin-D mediated immune response has been retained through millions of years of evolutionary selection, and is still found in species ranging from squirrel monkeys to baboons and humans, suggests that it must be critical to their survival, researchers say.

Even though the “cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide” has several different biological activities in addition to killing pathogens, it’s not clear which one, or combination of them, makes vitamin D so essential to its regulation.

The research also provides further evidence of the biological importance of adequate levels of vitamin D in humans and other primates, even as some studies and experts suggest that more than 50 percent of the children and adults in the U.S. are deficient in “the sunshine vitamin.”

“The existence and importance of this part of our immune response makes it clear that humans and other primates need to maintain sufficient levels of vitamin D,” said Adrian Gombart, an associate professor of biochemistry and a principal investigator with the Linus Pauling Institute at Oregon State University.

In simple terms, if you’re vitamin D deficient, your immune system will not activate to do its job. And since vitamin D also modulates (balances) your immune response, it prevents an overreaction in the form of inflammation, which can lead to autoimmune disorders like Crohn’s disease.

How Much Vitamin D Do You Need?

As I said previously, the only way to determine the correct oral dose of vitamin D is to have your blood tested.

I recommend using Lab Corp in the U.S. If you get it done by Quest, you’ll need to divide your result by 1.3 to get the number that actually correlates with all the research.

Getting the correct test is the first step in this process, as there are TWO vitamin D tests currently being offered: 1,25(OH)D, and 25(OH)D.

The correct test your doctor needs to order is 25(OH)D, also called 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which is the better marker of overall D status. This is the marker that is most strongly associated with overall health.

Next, the “normal” 25-hydroxyvitamin D lab range is between 20-56 ng/ml. As you can see in the chart below, this conventional range is really a sign of deficiency, and is too broad to be ideal.

In fact, your vitamin D level should never be below 32 ng/ml, and any levels below 20 ng/ml are considered serious deficiency states, increasing your risk of as many as 16 different cancers and autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, just to name a few.

The OPTIMAL value that you’re looking for is 55-65 ng/ml.

This range applies for everyone; children, adolescents, adults and seniors.

These ranges are based on healthy people in tropical or subtropical parts of the world, where they are receiving healthy sun exposures. It seems more than reasonable to assume that these values are in fact reflective of an optimal human requirement.

Keeping your level in this range, and even erring toward the higher numbers in this range, is going to give you the most protective benefit. And the way you maintain your levels within this range is by getting tested regularly — say two to four times a year in the beginning, and adjusting your vitamin D intake accordingly.

Vitamind.Mercola.com: New Resource for all the Latest Vitamin D News

Vitamin D, the powerful “sunshine” nutrient, is known for its many wonderful benefits including protection from multiple sclerosis, diabetes, cancer, and other diseases.

Because it is so vital to your health, I’ve added a special section to my website dedicated exclusively to keeping my readers updated on all the late-breaking vitamin D news.

Vitamind.Mercola.com provides you with important vitamin D resources you can’t easily find on the web, such as articles, tips and an online forum that will help you avoid vitamin D deficiency and lead a healthier life.

I encourage you to bookmark this link and visit it often to stay on top of all the latest research and guidance on optimizing and maintaining your vitamin D levels.

Related Links:

New Model for Cancer — Dynamite!

February 18th, 2010 . by DrHansen

Wednesday, February 17, 2010 - by AuthorDr. Axe

The Heat is On: Raw vs. Cooked Foods »

“With the proper diet, no doctor is necessary. With the improper diet, no doctor can help.”

~ Gabriel Cousens, author of Conscious Eating

Some “raw foodies” may seem extreme and obsessive, but there’s a lot to be said for increasing the amount of raw food in your diet. As naturopath Dr. Humbart Santillo says, “A human being is not maintained by food intake alone, but rather by what is digested.” 1

Contrary to popular belief, cooked foods are harder to digest than raw.

Enzymes

Alissa Cohen, author of Living on Live Food, says that cooking food over 112 degrees destroys vital enzyme content. 1 Nancy Lee Bentley, co-author of Dr. Mercola’s  Total Health Program, says that newer research suggests enzymes can become de-stabilized at temperatures as low as 72 degrees. 2

Naturopath Dr. Humbart Santillo explains that enzymes are used to break down food to smaller and more operable nutritional units. The pancreas and other cells produce enzymes within the body (endogenous enzymes), and raw foods are the source of exogenous enzymes, those found outside the body. 1

“The more one gets of the exogenous enzymes,” says Santillo, “the less will have to be borrowed [from the body.] One can live many years on a cooked food diet, but eventually this will cause cellular enzyme exhaustion, which lays the foundation for a weak immune system and ultimately—disease.” 1

University of California researchers measured the digestion of bread that had been cooked three ways: mildly, normally and over-baked. The longer the bread was cooked; the longer it stayed in the stomach. The over-baked bread caused an immune response in the bloodstream: it was treated as a foreign invader. 4

Scientist Francis Pottenger discovered that every food has a heat labile point. A heat labile point is the temperature at which the chemical configuration of food changes. Nancy Appleton, author of Suicide by Sugar, says we digest food in certain chemical configurations. Cooking styles that heat food to high temperatures create chemical configurations that the body is unfamiliar with and doesn’t have the enzymes to digest easily. 4

The Digestive Tract

As food sits in the digestive tract; it begins to ferment. Proteins putrefy and fats go rancid, irritating the mucosal lining and causing inflammation. The irritated cells of the digestive lining spread, allowing undigested and partially digested foods to pass through. This is leaky gut syndrome, which is linked to many allergic, autoimmune and digestive conditions. 4

In an article on Dr. Mercola’s website, “Raw Food–One of Your Keys to Outstanding Health,” Wes Peterson writes about some of the research that has been done concerning raw versus cooked food. 3

The first doctor to test and document the effects of cooked versus raw food on the immune system was Dr. Paul Kouchakoff of Switzerland. In the 1930’s, Kouchakoff found that food that was cooked until it was well done initiated a white blood cell rise called “digestive leukocytosis.” 3

Digestive leukocytosis resembles a stress response to infection or trauma. This increase in white blood cells had been observed by others but was thought to be a normal reaction to eating. At The Institute of Chemical Chemistry, Kouchakoff and others found that unaltered food (food that was raw or heated at very low temperatures) did not cause this immune reaction. They found that only food heated at very high temperatures or food that was processed and refined caused this rise in white blood cells. 3

They renamed the phenomenon “pathological leukocytosis” because they deemed it abnormal–or a response to abnormal food. The strongest food triggers of this reaction, heated or not, were processed and refined foods such as pasteurized and homogenized milk and margarine, and refined chocolate, sugar, candy, white flour and table salt. 3

Nancy Appleton reports that the average cancer risk due to amine exposure in cooked foods rises from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 50 in people who regularly eat large amounts of well-done and flame-broiled conventional meats. 4

Leif Busk, of the Swedish National Food Administration, says that overcooked starchy foods cause the formation of cancer-causing acrylamide. Acrylamide, says Appleton, forms not only in baked and fried starches but in meats cooked at high temperatures. As many as 20 identified cancer-causing heterocyclic amines (HCAs) have been found in such meats. 4

Published research has found a connection between well-done meats and stomach cancer and increased risk of breast, colorectal and pancreatic cancer with barbequed, fried and well-done meats. 4

Acidity & Alkalinity

Besides enzymes, the second most important benefit of raw foods is their effect on the acid/alkaline balance in our bodies, says Alissa Cohen. 1

Dr. Robert Young, author of The pH Miracle, describes “The New Biology.” Disease, Young says, is not caused by external sources such as bacteria. Disease occurs within the body when acidity undermines the immune system. When our bodies are at the proper acid/alkaline balance, we can combat and defeat any invader, correct any imbalance, roll with all the punches. Acidosis, due to environmental pollutants and stress, processed and refined foods, lack of biogenic or “life-giving” foods and mineral-deficient water, contributes to disease and disorder within the body. 5

The major cause of acidity is diet. Cooked foods create acidity in the body. Raw foods neutralize acid and are loaded with antioxidants.

Cooking does degrade some nutrients but it also makes others more digestible. Lightly cooking food at temperatures less than 100 degrees, steaming, juicing, sprouting and using slow cookers are ways to gently cook food.

Dr. Axe’s Action Steps

  1. I don’t recommend an entirely raw/vegetarian/vegan diet. Instead, aim for a 70/30 to 80/20 ratio of cooked versus raw foods.
  2. When lightly cooking your food, avoid the microwave! Regardless of how long food is in the microwave, using this method will alter the chemical structure of the food. Use the stovetop or oven to lightly steam vegetables or re-heat leftovers.
  3. To increase your intake of raw foods, begin the day with a Berry Smoothie, adding kale, spinach or red cabbage to the mix. Eat a large salad for lunch and load it up with other raw vegetables like bell peppers, cucumbers, carrots or tomatoes.
  4. Share your raw recipes with the DrAxe.com health community below!

Related Articles

Cancer’s Link to Your Diet

Sometimes You Feel Like a Nut

The ‘Depression Diet’

Eating Seasonally

Why Buy Organic?

February 17th, 2010 . by DrHansen

Whether you are on a budget and need to prioritize your organic purchases, or you would simply like to know which type of produce has the highest pesticide residues—and which do not—the following guide will help.


12 Most Contaminated

  • Peaches
  • Apples
  • Sweet Bell Peppers
  • Celery
  • Nectarines
  • Strawberries
  • Cherries
  • Pears
  • Grapes (Imported)
  • Spinach
  • Lettuce
  • Potatoes

12 Least Contaminated

  • Onions
  • Avocado
  • Sweet Corn (Frozen)
  • Pineapples
  • Mango
  • Asparagus
  • Sweet Peas (Frozen)
  • Kiwi Fruit
  • Bananas
  • Cabbage
  • Broccoli
  • Papaya

5 Mistakes that Put People in Nursing Homes!

February 16th, 2010 . by DrHansen


Reason #3 to live in alignment with the 5 essentials of Maximized Living!

Mistake #1 They THOUGHT it would NEVER happen to them:

It does not matter what I think about the law of gravity. Every time I try to prove it false, I lose. Gods laws of health and healing are the same. He made our bodies to work in a very specific way. Thinking that you are different than the 3 million plus people that die of chronic illness is just silly. You eat what they eat, you workout as much as they do, you think like they think, what will keep you from getting what they get? NOTHING! Thinking is a powerful weapon. It can lead you to health and healing or it can lead you to the nursing home. Look at your life today; most likely it is a representation of what you have been thinking for the last 90 days. Want to change your life? Start thinking differently. Start focusing in the direction you WANT your life to move in. Stop thinking about what you have today, and start thinking about what you want your life look like. They thought it wouldn’t happen to them, it did. What are you thinking?

Mistake #2 They NEGLECT their way into poor health:

The crazy thing about poor health and abundant health is that it is a daily choice. Eating good food, thinking good thoughts, spending 15 minutes a day exercising, getting adjusted at least 1 time a week, are all decisions you have to make on a daily basis. No one ever ends up in a nursing home by eating 1 junk meal, missing 1 workout, thinking 1 negative thought, or missing 1 adjustment. Instead they end up in the nursing home because they NEGLECTED to make these essentials a normal part of their life.

Mistake #3 They judged their HEALTH based on how they FEEL:

The problem with nursing homes is that they are full of people who felt just fine until “IT” happened. “IT” can be cancer, diabetes, Alzheimers, heart disease, or failure of healing. What they don’t know is that “IT” was happening in their body for 15 to 20 years before they ever FELT it. One of the reasons we have one of the worst health care systems in the world is because doctors only get paid when YOU feel “IT”.

Mistake #4 They TRUSTED in a lie:

People in nursing homes believed the lie. The lie is you really don’t need to get serious about changing the way you eat, exercise, think or live. Just take the doctors magic pills and allow them to take organs out of your body when they rot out and you will spend the last years of your life on a tropical fantasy island. Medicine is for emergencies and special cases, but never to be the end all, be all. They believed that as long as they took their medicine like they where told, all would be okay. After all who can really change the way they live? We have lots of nursing homes for you when your body begins to fail because of 20 years of disease growing in you. They will have lots of pill for you then to keep you quiet.

Mistake # 5 They NEVER KNEW the POWER of an ADJUSTMENT:

Chiropractic adjustments are not a treatment for pain or disease. Adjustments in our center are given to maximize the healing and health making powers in your body. Adjustments are something you do on a weekly basis to feel, look, and be your best. Adjustments give your body and mind the power it needs to take care of you and keep you strong. Health is your God given natural state, you were NEVER meant to spend ONE DAY in a nursing home due to chronic illness.

Are you ready to stop making MISTAKES? Are you living everyday to the fullest? If not, WHY?

I can help you get your life going in the right direction and away from spending your last years in a nursing home! Please refer friends & family who you truly care about.

Doctors with a Heart Patient Appreciation Day- Don’t miss this event

February 15th, 2010 . by DrHansen

Don’t Forget Today Monday Feb. 15th is Patient Appreciation Day, If you know anyone who needs my help we are offering Consultation, Exam, Digital X-rays, and Report of Findings for only $25.00 that will be donated to LOVE INC. Please call 916 685-1230 to set up your appointment we only have a limited amount of appointments left.

Over Half a Million U.S. Kids Per Year Suffer Health Reactions From Drugs

February 12th, 2010 . by DrHansen

by David Gutierrez, staff writer

(NaturalNews) More than half a million children suffer adverse reactions every year in the United States from prescription drugs, according to a study conducted by researchers from the Children’s Hospital in Boston and published in the journal Pediatrics.

The researchers examined data on emergency room and clinic visits between the years of 1995 and 2005 by children under the age of 18. The average number of children receiving treatment for adverse prescription drug effects each year in that time period was 585,922. The number fluctuated very little from year to year.

Adverse drug events included accidental overdoses, side effects and wrong prescriptions.

Prior research has found that another half million children suffer adverse prescription drug reactions every year while in hospitals, bringing the total annual number of adverse drug effects in children up to more than one million. These numbers do not include negative reactions to over-the-counter drugs.

Researchers in the current study uncovered no reports of deaths caused by adverse drug reactions, but 5 percent of children did require hospitalization. Forty-three percent of the adverse reactions occurred in children under the age of five, with another 23 percent occurring in those between the ages of 15 and 18.

The most common causes of adverse effects in young children were prescription antibiotics. Some of the more common side effects were diarrhea, rash and stomach ache. Birth control pills were a common cause of side effects in teenagers, producing problems such as nausea, vomiting and disrupted menstrual cycles.

Drugs for depression and cancer were also significant causes of negative reactions.

According to lead author Florence Bourgeois, doctors need to inform parents of the possible side effects of any drugs children are given. Parents should watch their children especially carefully when a new drug is taken, she said, because “first-time medication exposures may reveal an allergic reaction.”

Sources for this story include: www.foxnews.com; healthfieldmedicare.suite101.com.

Share Buzz up!vote now



All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml

« Previous Entries